|
|
« Reply #195 on: April 30, 2011, 08:00:00 PM » |
|
Funny, because according to the English language, when one speaks the word "our" or the many other forms of the word, it would mean that they are including a specific group in mind or even a couple of other individuals while including themselves in said statement. If they wished not to include themselves, they would use "their", which would point out to a group without including themselves. However, it is quite clear that you specifically professed your statement with the word "our", and thus have included yourself in a group in which you do not belong, while giving off the image that you believe yourself to be of higher standing than others.
Do learn to control yourself and keep your head leveled, rather than high in the clouds full of delusions and arrogance, not the mention ignorance.
Failure to comply with an admin Nice to see your failure at rule comprehension still applies Stickman, as I haven't done even the slightest of things wrong at this point.
And I was ninja'd by your post anyway, so there's no way I would've seen it. or do you just not want any statements that aren't your own to be made right now? Well, despite the fact that I'm not even talking to you anyway. ¦D
Quoting just for you Stickman, just in case you're being a little too blind-sighted to look back and see it. ¦3
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #196 on: April 30, 2011, 08:01:36 PM » |
|
So, a lot of questions and problems have been posted here, but no answers. Admins?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #197 on: April 30, 2011, 08:07:26 PM » |
|
Hmm and I thought Private Messages were supposed to be, well, private.
Hence the word, "private" in it. Yeah...About that...I'm going to have to apologize to Stickman for posting this conversation we had: admins could be warned last year. not this year. And what is the reason for admins not being able to be warned this year? So they can do whatever they want and get away with It? yes. we took that out so that we could spread mayhem across the boards we didnt have the same warning system as last year. it just happens that the new one doesnt have the admin ban permissions, but it is more effective with dealing with the normal people, and we just assume that our admins are at least a little trustworthy Yes, It just so happens that you can't warn admins with the new system. From what I read about the April Fools Day joke, Miacis prevented people from editing their accounts to force the joke on them. If he can't be punished for that, then just how far does an admin have to go before you realize that having the admins be immune to punishment isn't a good idea? I shouldn't have to explain this to you because you're a smart person, but nobody on any forum should have punishment immunity. That's way too much power, and is the kind of thing that leads to corruption (Yeah...I said It). I wouldn't even trust you with that much power, and I know you can be trusted.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #198 on: April 30, 2011, 08:09:55 PM » |
|
The only thing going thru my mind after reading all this is.... What Goal are you all trying to reach with all this? Just think about it... What does anyone gain or lose really? Is anyone gonna recieve a prize, or a Check in the mail? What?... Its point less... Or is it just for self-satisfaction?
|
|
|
Logged
|
FC:4898-8419-2778
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #199 on: April 30, 2011, 08:16:45 PM » |
|
*waves* now, here's something else that needs some sort of an explanation. I'd like you present you with another example of how the rules are ignored by their creators. Here are the rules. This may be your first time reading them: *yes we all know what the rules look like*Here's where they're infracted: http://forums.kc-mm.com/index.php?action=profile;u=11941thank you vish I'd love to see the excuse for this one He made that alt account to try and amuse the people in the family, and it was working to. You guys are so generous to turn on him.
and think of this, admins here probably have a lot of alternate accounts used to test forum features, ban them too?
You're not very reasonable, and all I really have to say to this is
Don't like it?Leave.We're not forcing you to visit this place.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #200 on: April 30, 2011, 08:20:39 PM » |
|
The only thing going thru my mind after reading all this is.... What Goal are you all trying to reach with all this? Just think about it... What does anyone gain or lose really? Is anyone gonna recieve a prize, or a Check in the mail? What?... Its point less... Or is it just for self-satisfaction?
Asking that now would solve anything Nuke, as the ends justify the means.
Then, I'm just here for the hell of it. I didn't do anything to get infracted, be it warned or moderated, so I do in fact request and demand that my level be brought back down to normal. After having an infraction for two months, getting one again simply because an admin is having a hard time grasping things and getting a temper doesn't exactly strike me as a model example of administration and moderation.
However, on the multi-account thing, so it's fine for Vish to have multiple accounts for a joke, but Kata and I can't share an account for a family joke? Yes, that definitely sound perfectly fair.
Though I know you actually sided with me on that Oizen, Miacis allowing this yes infracting the two of us over that definitely is nothing short of hypocrisy.
|
|
« Last Edit: April 30, 2011, 08:22:03 PM by Keil Crimson »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #201 on: April 30, 2011, 08:21:39 PM » |
|
Oh, so now amusement is an exception to the rules? cool. story. bro. The only thing going thru my mind after reading all this is.... What Goal are you all trying to reach with all this? Just think about it... What does anyone gain or lose really? Is anyone gonna recieve a prize, or a Check in the mail? What?... Its point less... Or is it just for self-satisfaction?
What I'm hoping to come out of this with is a fully functional KC:MM without corrupt admins who constantly abuse their powers. A KC:MM that everyone can have an enjoyable time on, and inb4 "I hav fun." Some people feel that the admins are out of place in some areas, specifically ones mentioned on the last few pages that you may or may not have read. A KC:MM where people aren't discriminated against, where nobody has to worry. Do you think that the examples provided are acceptable administrator behaviour? An honest answer. Please. Anyone.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #202 on: April 30, 2011, 08:23:50 PM » |
|
He made that alt account to try and amuse the people in the family, and it was working to. You guys are so generous to turn on him.
and think of this, admins here probably have a lot of alternate accounts used to test forum features, ban them too?
You're not very reasonable, and all I really have to say to this is
Don't like it?Leave.We're not forcing you to visit this place.
I can understand admins have alt accounts for testing forum features, but to amuse the family? Well I might as well be able to make multiple accounts just to post in my own threads and have fun right?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Zephiel: You know what I really like on my stack smash? Texture updates.
Androu1: @Zephiel: “your†Stack Smash?
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #203 on: April 30, 2011, 08:27:44 PM » |
|
Quite indeed, VILE, it is quite... A petty reason to break the rules.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #204 on: April 30, 2011, 08:34:07 PM » |
|
You guys do realize the muti account thing is only for people trying to avoid a ban/warning, right?
Funny story on how it happened.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #205 on: April 30, 2011, 08:34:47 PM » |
|
You guys do realize the muti account thing is only for people trying to avoid a ban/warning, right?
Funny story on how it happened.
I thought it was also for people making multi accounts to get hacks of people they wanted with polls
|
|
|
Logged
|
3DS FC: 3265-5237-3766
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #206 on: April 30, 2011, 08:36:06 PM » |
|
I thought it was also for people making multi accounts to get hacks of people they wanted with polls
It is.
Did DRAGONROBOT do this?
No.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #207 on: April 30, 2011, 08:41:58 PM » |
|
You guys do realize the muti account thing is only for people trying to avoid a ban/warning, right?
- Creating multiple accounts, or using someone else's account isn't allowed (especially in order to bypass a sanction).
It says it isn't allowed all together, it just adds extra emphasis on the bypass of a warning. So no I don't realize.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Zephiel: You know what I really like on my stack smash? Texture updates.
Androu1: @Zephiel: “your†Stack Smash?
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #208 on: April 30, 2011, 08:43:04 PM » |
|
It says it isn't allowed all together, it just adds extra emphasis on the bypass of a warning.
So no I don't realize.
Thinking like that doesn't get you very far.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #209 on: April 30, 2011, 08:52:30 PM » |
|
Thinking like that doesn't get you very far.
So presenting the rules to someone who is using them as their defense is implied to be ignorant thinking? And technically, that is off topic and flaming.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Zephiel: You know what I really like on my stack smash? Texture updates.
Androu1: @Zephiel: “your†Stack Smash?
|
|
|
|
|