the stages are all done. I've got the music covered as I replaced at least one song per stage. I'm also making some, if not half, of the BRSTMs.
Know what would be cool? replacing the SSE enemies with Pokemon. Not the ones in the Pokeball item or in the Pokemon Brawl roster.
Oh I see, well I was only asking because I finally managed to finished my Pokemon HG/SS Elite 4 stage pack last night (all 4 elite 4 arenas from Pokemon HG/SS), I can show you pictures if needed. So I was going to ask you if you wanted to put any of em' in the Pokemon PSA Pack pack but you said you got all the stages finished so never mind then lol.
Are you guys going to do that idea with the SSE bosses?? Seems like that would be a lot of extra work but then again it would being staying TRUE to the name "SUPER POKEMON BROS. BRAWL"
Honostly, I do not really care, but if I had to choose, I would say I would go with the rating suggestion. And I think commenting would be legit too. Only registered users should be able to comment whenever they want. Obviously, the commenting system would work the same way as posting.
That is true, this site does have some really [censored]ty textures, but, they will get a small amount of downloads, if any. If you wanna see the good textures you can just view the hacks with the most downloads, ya know. That said, however, anyone could just post the most ass textures created on the vault and get away with it.
Texture hacking is art, you know. It's just an insult to KC-MM to see some really bad quality textures everywhere, it makes the site look bad. I am not trying to offend anyone, but seriously, there needs to be a limit.
SoOOOO000000......... do you agree or disagree with the rating suggestion?........
Think about this, having a rating system would still make it so that the better hacks will get better ratings, and not so good ones wont (at least not as good of a rating). This would be unfair to those who arent that good at animating, psa, etc. It would certainly shut down (probably, maybe...) on the noob material, but it would still be more or less the same as it is now, making it pointless.
Also as Albafika said, there's too many hacks in the Vault now to consider that...
Thats my two cents.
Hmm I see what you mean, but!.....Don't "BETTER" hacks deserve "BETTER" ratings anyway? I mean why wouldn't/shouldn't a "BETTER" hack get a "BETTER" rating than a "GOOD" hack or a poor hack?
And I mentioned that one of the ratings would be "DECENT", which equals like a 65% on a test. Just barely passing but still passing (just good enough to be eligible). So that means the hack wouldn't have to be like Mewtwo2000's Peaches Castle 64 quality but it could still be good and be eligible for submition.
I think maybe you misunderstood the point that I'm suggesting. I'm NOT saying that ONLY hacks that are of OVER the top "LENSHO status" quality should be submitted. I'm saying that only hacks of DECENT quality or HIGHER should be eligible. So we don't get those hacks like thate Arceus one being uploaded and so we don't get noobs uploading their hacks everyday and flushing the good hacks away with their poorly made 10min hacks.
I suggested before that the rating system could also just consist of a group of highly trusted and experienced people that get voted into the position of rating hacks. They could have a group voting session and they would ALL decided the quality of a hack. So immature people wouldn't have the ability to rate a hack as good just because they like the name or because they know the person, nor would they be able t rate it as bad because of bull[censored] reasons. Thus eliminating the possibility of the system being abused The point of the system is to increase the amount of good quality hacks and some of the people on the vault would like to more GOOD hacks being released instead of the increasely high amounts of noob material. As NoAH said everyone has to start somewhere but what about the people that are ALREADY far past that "somewhere"?
The star idea could work or it could be a decent/Good/great/awesome! rating system. As I said before there would be no poor or bad ratings because every hack released would be at least decent.
Honesty, it seems like the only way the quality/rating system would be possible is if someone made ANOTHER website where hacks can be uploaded just like Brawl Vault. However it would have different rules of course so it wouldn't be very much like Brawl vault is that sense. I'm guessing there would be a chosen group of people who rated the hacks and depending on the rating that would determine whether or not the hack is eligible for submition. If it is it would be posted on the site for people to see,download and rate themselves. I actually like the idea of another website that operated under a rating system. It would be a place were the experienced hackers could go and have their good hacks be uploaded around other good hacks. It would be like the SERIOUS version of Brawl Vault lol. Chances are it won't happen here it won't happen here so we should all just stop suggesting it here. Post Merge: October 01, 2012, 11:51:56 PM
^^Point taken, though I couldn't consider 100+ as a lot. Personally I'll be happy when one of my hacks hits 500 downloads. Either way, I guess people just want different characters no matter the quality then. I mean look at the Sephiroth psa, the newer models look great but the animations..
Anyway, sorrry about that whole off topicness. I guess a quality control thing could work, though i have no idea how.
Yeah I know it wouldm't be considered alot. But its ONLY day 3 and it's still there AND it's still of bad quality; is what I was getting at
Ah sweet then. Well, i may be late but from what I saw about the whole topics thing with ratings. I sort of think the number of downloads acts as a ratings system. I mean no one would get thousands on a single hack unless it's either really good, or the best version (at the time) of a really popular thing. I don't think anyone would be desperate enough to download their own hack hundreds or thousands of times.
However, if there were to be a system, it could be using stars AND a description as to why you rated it how you did. Which the rating reviews could then be looked over by moderators or whatever before approved. Pretty much like when a person gets moderated. I think it could work similar to ZFGC's Karma changing system. It prevents abuse but it also sounds like a ton of work.
I beg to differ. The Arceus model (which is one of the things that started that other thread in the first place) has 100+ DL's yet it has no animations. The quality of that hack is poor as hell. Yet it's been on the "most popular hacks" list for 3 days now. There's a Cubone over squirtel hack that has 530+ DL's and it is of the exact same quality as the Arceus model. Yet it's on the first page when you click "top downloads" for squirtal.
Point being just because something has a high amount of downloads doesn't mean it is actually a GOOD hack. That is why Pik suggested a quality control person/people and I suggested a rating system with a quality control group as well.
Now that I think of it......Why are we still even talking about this? Bottom line (since we can't change the submition rules) If you see a hack you don't like.......Just don't download it and move on.....
I agree. There have been a lack of decent hacks recently. We have plenty imports imo, but we lack more good stages and PSAs(SDo0m D: D: D:).
There doesn't seem to be many stage hackers in general actually. There's like 3 stage releases every 10 character/PSA releases. And only like 1-2 of the 3 are even good most of the time.
Show Posts
version of Brawl Vault lol.