|
|
 |
« Reply #6645 on: April 11, 2012, 08:33:59 AM » |
|
Will he have some Wind Waker move?  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 11, 2012, 08:44:54 AM by SDo0m InFiNiTy »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #6646 on: April 11, 2012, 09:21:01 AM » |
|
I'll be honest. The fact they made Lucario a more technical character irks me. Since's he one of my mains...
And his arm looks horrible in that one screenshot...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #6647 on: April 11, 2012, 01:07:43 PM » |
|
Actually, I do follow P:M. I just don't look that often... And on Sunday!? cool! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #6648 on: April 11, 2012, 01:55:52 PM » |
|
:/
I liked Shieks chain as a tether... *irritated*
I also liked the removal of wavedashing... I main Fox who was known for his wavedashing and shine dashing combos. I purposely decided to not use it because I saw it as unfair. The moment I saw someone shine dash someone from the right side of final... the the bottom of the screen on the left side... I opted to not use something so cheap.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #6649 on: April 11, 2012, 02:14:01 PM » |
|
:/
I liked Shieks chain as a tether... *irritated*
I also liked the removal of wavedashing... I main Fox who was known for his wavedashing and shine dashing combos. I purposely decided to not use it because I saw it as unfair. The moment I saw someone shine dash someone from the right side of final... the the bottom of the screen on the left side... I opted to not use something so cheap.
Still not as bad as the cheap as hell locks MK has. Not to mention waveshining at least takes skill, comparative to MK who is braindead as hell to play. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #6650 on: April 11, 2012, 02:23:30 PM » |
|
Is the new project m done?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #6651 on: April 11, 2012, 02:26:40 PM » |
|
Still not as bad as the cheap as hell locks MK has. Not to mention waveshining at least takes skill, comparative to MK who is braindead as hell to play.
I have to agree with him on Sheik's Tether recovery being taken away. What possible reason could they have to take that away, cause she didn't have it in Melee or something? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #6652 on: April 11, 2012, 02:29:38 PM » |
|
I have to agree with him on Sheik's Tether recovery being taken away. What possible reason could they have to take that away, cause she didn't have it in Melee or something?
Precisely why. Sheik is top tier in Melee and as a result she's been remade to how she was in Melee. Keeping the tether would act as an unnecessary buff. There was no reason to keep it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #6653 on: April 11, 2012, 02:31:14 PM » |
|
Precisely why. Sheik is top tier in Melee and as a result she's been remade to how she was in Melee. Keeping the tether would act as an unnecessary buff. There was no reason to keep it.
*Sigh* So they couldn't keep anything from Brawl? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #6654 on: April 11, 2012, 02:46:18 PM » |
|
I cant play well on wii-remote on P:M
Guess ill just use the GC controller to be more accurate
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #6655 on: April 11, 2012, 02:59:11 PM » |
|
*Sigh* So they couldn't keep anything from Brawl?
Well depends on the character. Plenty of vBrawl stuff has been kept, but our main goal is to take Melee's foundation and improve it fundamentally and balance the game to around the level of Melee top tiers rather than completely stray away from that like Brawl did.
Remember the goal of P:M isn't to make Melee again because that would be pointless. We're trying to make a sequel. A progression. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #6656 on: April 11, 2012, 03:02:45 PM » |
|
Well depends on the character. Plenty of vBrawl stuff has been kept, but our main goal is to take Melee's foundation and improve it fundamentally and balance the game to around the level of Melee top tiers rather than completely stray away from that like Brawl did.
Remember the goal of P:M isn't to make Melee again because that would be pointless. We're trying to make a sequel. A progression.
So, your guys' idea of progression for Shiek, is making Shiek like she was in Melee? No distinct, unique changes to her playstyle -As fas as I could tell from reading her page-? Making her like she was in Melee seems more like a step backward or a lack of progression than a progress to me. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #6657 on: April 11, 2012, 03:08:03 PM » |
|
So, your guys' idea of progression for Shiek, is making Shiek like she was in Melee? No distinct, unique changes to her playstyle -As fas as I could tell from reading her page-? Making her like she was in Melee seems more like a step backward or a lack of progression than a progress to me.
Making her like she was in Melee is a step frontward as she was Top Tier in Melee. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #6658 on: April 11, 2012, 03:11:02 PM » |
|
Making her like she was in Melee is a step frontward as she was Top Tier in Melee.
I really couldn't give less of a [censored] that she was Top Tier in Melee. If you're gonna make a progression, make her like she was in Melee and take it a step forward instead of just making her like she was in Melee and just leaving her. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #6659 on: April 11, 2012, 03:12:36 PM » |
|
yes! i cant wait!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
