I'm here to discuss an issue caused by a member, instigated and unresolved by an administrator.
Today, I get this message:
That is against the rules, isn't it?
He should at least get a warning, shouldn't he?
As some of you may know, I got my PM privileges taken away once. I got them back a couple of months ago, with the promise that I wouldn't curse or fighting with anyone over a PM.
When I got that ridiculous [censored], my first instant reaction was to write back, but I know better than that.
Therefore, I posted on the Moderation Center, to talk about it. Of course, still heated at the time for getting such a [censored]ing message, yet not being able to write back.
What do I get in return? A warning.
I understand that something I said may have been against the rules, no excuses.
Still, giving me a warning, for venting on that thread, rather than messaging the user, did not [censored]ing resolve anything.
It actually pissed me off even more than I already was.
And to top it all off, the user who sent me an insulting message, didn't get anything for it.
Miacis knows everything about me not being able to curse or fight with anyone threw PM, and they are both very good online friends.
Coincidence? I don't [censored]ing think so.
Thanks for not resolving the problem, and actually making it worse than it should have been to begin with.