Brawlbox Resources & History

[pikazz]

the PAT0's struckture is already done :notimp:

[Xiggah]

the PAT0's struckture is already done :notimp:

Well, there's one done. Did BJ have those notes this whole time or was he redoing it himself?

[♤♡◇♧]

Figured something out about G&W's animations:

Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.

[Xiggah]

Figured something out about G&W's animations:

Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.

Yeah, I think it's a bug with Brawlbox, reading the keyframes as interpolation rather than linear. We briefly mentioned it about 30 pages ago. I do think we already have CHR0 completely mapped out, so it should be a small fix.

[BlackJax96]

There were some float values that were read as integers in the SCN0 light data (which results in huge numbers), so I fixed that. Looking through to make sure there aren't any other misread values.

And Kryal actually set up linear interpolation, but didn't use it...
I'll have to take a look at GW's animations myself.

[DarkPikachu]

I see your Brbx still has that polygon deal...

load the menu or title and preview it to see what I mean

[BlackJax96]

I see your Brbx still has that polygon deal...

load the menu or title and preview it to see what I mean

Yeah, I think it has to do with the vertices not being XYZ and the vertex buffer being set up for only XYZ vertices. I thought that 0.0f was put for the Z value in the buffer if not present, but maybe not...

[Xiggah]

There were some float values that were read as integers in the SCN0 light data (which results in huge numbers), so I fixed that. Looking through to make sure there aren't any other misread values.

And Kryal actually set up linear interpolation, but didn't use it...
I'll have to take a look at GW's animations myself.

Linear interpolation was never used? It sounds so much easier to set up than normal interpolation... I think setting up keyframes to use linear more often would make animators happier than an undo button.

EDIT: Ooo, I thought of something. Could Brawlbox allow you to add multiple textures to a material?

[DarkPikachu]

Yeah, I think it has to do with the vertices not being XYZ and the vertex buffer being set up for only XYZ vertices. I thought that 0.0f was put for the Z value in the buffer if not present, but maybe not...

that's another deal I had too...
that same value is different for all 3 vecotor types >_>

I'm confused on it though...
I always though it was if the verts had bounds or not...

although...
OGL can do 2D and 4D (I think) verts... maybe that's what it means >_>

if that's so,
a simple fix for your problem would be to simply add 0 to the Z vector (if 2D)
before appending the vert to the buffer

I wonder...
I want to test my theory now XD
name me an MDL0 that's set up like that plz :)
(tell me where it is too) XD

[BlackJax96]

Linear interpolation was never used? It sounds so much easier to set up than normal interpolation... I think setting up keyframes to use linear more often would make animators happier than an undo button.

EDIT: Ooo, I thought of something. Could Brawlbox allow you to add multiple textures to a material?

No, not making them linear, but actually coding proper interpolation with a tangent editor would be what would make animators happy. Linear Interpolation < Undo < Editable Interpolation

And are you talking about SRT0 or MDL0 materials? :srs:

that's another deal I had too...
that same value is different for all 3 vecotor types >_>

I'm confused on it though...
I always though it was if the verts had bounds or not...

although...
OGL can do 2D and 4D (I think) verts... maybe that's what it means >_>

if that's so,
a simple fix for your problem would be to simply add 0 to the Z vector (if 2D)
before appending the vert to the buffer

I wonder...
I want to test my theory now XD
name me an MDL0 that's set up like that plz :)
(tell me where it is too) XD

That's exactly what I said. :srs:
And nah

[DSX8]

well if any1 wants any progress on BB.... SCN0 rebuilder is almost done.... but he's adding a new feature to the Model Viewer...

if any1 can figure it out, u get a cookie! (i kno wat it is tho :P)

[Xiggah]

No, not making them linear, but actually coding proper interpolation with a tangent editor would be what would make animators happy. Linear Interpolation < Undo < Editable Interpolation

And are you talking about SRT0 or MDL0 materials? :srs:

Ah, priorities...

I meant MDL0 materials, like how eyes often have 3 textures layered on. I wasn't aware if it was doable or not, I only noticed that the textures number of a material was changeable.

EDIT: Ah, Add New Reference. My bad, I didn't notice that before.

[pikazz]

Figured something out about G&W's animations:

Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.

it's because brawl animation doesn't use interpolation (or whats the name again?) and G&W is a perfect example on that. but BB adds them and it turns out to that D: it was hard to do caramelldansen and some other animations with G&W

Well, there's one done. Did BJ have those notes this whole time or was he redoing it himself?

I believe he had mine cause I gave it to him if I dont got it wrong o.o

[SOJ]

So will we be able to save in this new brawlbox or do we have to revert back to v0.65 to save?

[Xiggah]

it's because brawl animation doesn't use interpolation (or whats the name again?) and G&W is a perfect example on that. but BB adds them and it turns out to that D: it was hard to do caramelldansen and some other animations with G&W
I believe he had mine cause I gave it to him if I dont got it wrong o.o

We'll bring up G&W enough times until the keyframes gets fixed :P Asides from Game&Watch, it makes me wonder what other animations we view incorrectly.

No wonder BJ didn't mention PAT0 files on the to-do list of files to decipher, it must already be done. Good work deciphering PAT0. You should teach me your art of file deciphering so i can teach others >.>

And the new Brawlbox won't be a beta, (I think) so it should be able to save properly.