Huh. Well, is it a award possible of tracking or is it one of the things where you gotta manually track people?
It's something where you've got to manually track people.
No, actually, it's even worse than that. it's just impossible to verify. There is no way to know how many BV reports a user has done, even individually.
Hey guys, I was wondering something. I know that some awards are difficult to give out due to the fact you have to check on each members to see if they actually deserves it. What if that wasn't the case though. What if the members themselves were to just let you know that they have such requirements to receive the award. Also, any one who wants to speak or vouch for someone's behalf for an award. Anyways just a thought.
We thought about doing that for some awards, but I dunno, I don't really like the idea. Simply because it would basically favour the ones checking that topic (or even just having read the OP), and I'm pretty sure that leaves out a whole lot of people.
Just look at the Contributor award. It is kinda "given on user input" too, and so far, I think only 2-3 people nominated Contributors on this topic.
I don't know. If you guys really want it to be like that, I guess I could roll with it, but personnally I'm not sure it's gonna be that great.
Have you guys find a way to tweak the exact order of the awards yet? It has glitches, and you can only have them in some ways. Some are paired, I believe because they belong in the same category.
As Oizen stated. The Favorite goes first, and the others are displayed by chronological order.
It's not even glitchy, actually. It's just too simple of a mod to allow such customised ordering. We downloaded the mod like that.
Perhaps picano or Vyse could (?) add that customised order feature, but I believe they have higher priorities right now. (And I'm not sure how complicated it would be to do.)
