Brawl Vault Problems, Updates, and Suggestions

[Speedy101]

http://forums.kc-mm.com/Gallery/BrawlView.php?Number=29899

Those Ghost hacks just  keep appearing out of nowhere now huh

[Exorcist]

http://forums.kc-mm.com/Gallery/BrawlView.php?Number=29907

Uh
I don't remember what conclusion you guys got to regarding stuff like this. >.>

[Segtendo]

http://forums.kc-mm.com/Gallery/BrawlView.php?Number=29907

Uh
I don't remember what conclusion you guys got to regarding stuff like this. >.>

Following up on that.
http://forums.kc-mm.com/Gallery/BrawlView.php?Number=29908
.-.

[KingJigglypuff]

http://forums.kc-mm.com/Gallery/BrawlView.php?Number=29907

Uh
I don't remember what conclusion you guys got to regarding stuff like this. >.>

Following up on that.
http://forums.kc-mm.com/Gallery/BrawlView.php?Number=29908
.-.

If I recall, packs are allowed, but only if all the contents are made by the uploader him/herself. And if they used anything form another user in their work, they must have a .txt file in their download with a list of all the users the uploader used things from.

And in this case, I downloaded this submission, and looked at the files. They are all edits of already existing PSAs on the Vault. There is a .txt file, but there is no list of users on it.

This is what the .txt file says:

Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.

I say that this should be removed from the Vault and have this user watched.

And just a tip, this user (narutofan1) is an alt of RasenganKameha.

[Miacis]

If I recall, packs are allowed, but only if all the contents are made by the uploader him/herself. And if they used anything form another user in their work, they must have a .txt file in their download with a list of all the users the uploader used things from.

Guys, it's not about recalling. Just read the BV rules when in doubt:

Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.

Condition #1 is a bit iffy, and condition #2 hasn't been satisfied at all. Usually, I would suggest either reporting, or deleting.
But considering the user, I think the latter may be more effective.

[Puraidou]

Taken care of, hopefully the next upload will be valid.

[Meta Jirachi]

Hacksponge has added adfly links to his hacks again. should I be reporting all of them or something?

[Albafika]

Hacksponge has added adfly links to his hacks again. should I be reporting all of them or something?

Don't bother. I'll handle it.

[Meta Jirachi]

Don't bother. I'll handle it.

Thanks. Also like RandomTbush said, some of boygos hacks have adfly.

[Don Jon Bravo]

 can we report an import for an arm not rigged?
only one arm is rigged lol

[Albafika]

Thanks. Also like RandomTbush said, some of boygos hacks have adfly.

:>.>:

can we report an import for an arm not rigged?
only one arm is rigged lol

MW.  What r u doing! Stahp!

[??_?]

What's the problem with adfly links?

[Miacis]

Uploading Methods

• Any link that requires a user to do anything other than click "download" is not allowed. Sites with timers (e.g. RapidShare) are fine; sites with ads or passwords are not.

Adf.ly is exactly the kind of thing that fits in the "with ads" category, since you need to be waiting to view an ad, then skipping it before accessing the DL link.

[??_?]

I understand it's a rule, I just don't understand why

[Spex130]

I understand it's a rule, I just don't understand why

At least for Ad.fly, people make money off of the clicks. That's a good enough reason to keep that site out.