|
|
 |
« Reply #4185 on: July 25, 2012, 09:36:32 AM » |
|
He did give permission
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Quotes: Not all people have the luxury of being able to buy things whenever they want.
Some people are barely scraping by in the economy.
Modding has made you guys so spoiled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #4186 on: July 25, 2012, 09:45:13 AM » |
|
You know, if we're going along with this whole "no straight .rel ports" rule, the actual rules really need to be updated to reflect this. We can't expect everyone to sift through this thread just to know one brand new rule. He did give permission
Well, I guess it was OK then. I mean, if the creator was OK with it then who are we to say otherwise? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #4187 on: July 25, 2012, 09:48:45 AM » |
|
He did give permission In that case, i'll make it viewable again. (if i can >.>) edit: There we go. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #4188 on: July 25, 2012, 11:24:41 AM » |
|
You know, if we're going along with this whole "no straight .rel ports" rule, the actual rules really need to be updated to reflect this. We can't expect everyone to sift through this thread just to know one brand new rule.
Well, I guess it was OK then. I mean, if the creator was OK with it then who are we to say otherwise?
Agreed. May I remind you guys that you have a private board (and MSN chatroom) for that? So just discuss any rule changes that you believe need discussing in there, make a recap of what we need to add, and we'll add it. Don't just make rules on the fly and apply them before they're even actual rules. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Round and round the signature goes ~ ~ where it stops, nobody knows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #4189 on: July 25, 2012, 11:46:04 AM » |
|
Kagemaru has no say on what's allowed and not, we decided that straight .REL ports are banned unless it's made by creator himself or given permission by them.
Are it his files alone or other people as well?
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #4190 on: July 25, 2012, 01:35:50 PM » |
|
Erk. My bad Miacis.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #4191 on: July 25, 2012, 07:14:56 PM » |
|
Feature Question:
When a Collab is edited, could the PM report tell what's been changed? Like "File link updated" or "Desc has been changed". Kinda confusing to know what's new when I dono what was already there.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #4192 on: July 25, 2012, 07:25:13 PM » |
|
Feature Question:
When a Collab is edited, could the PM report tell what's been changed? Like "File link updated" or "Desc has been changed". Kinda confusing to know what's new when I dono what was already there.
Would be too much work, but it's certainly possible. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #4193 on: July 26, 2012, 12:51:09 AM » |
|
i have a sugestion when we update an hack why not add a button to say new version and it would appear again in the newest hacks but keeping the everything even download number since sometimes we update a hack and most ppl dont even realize since they dont read the thread and people dont like making a new release and call it V2 i think this would help everyone to keep up with updates and would make less hacks in the vault called V2 1.2 and so on.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #4194 on: July 26, 2012, 08:03:00 AM » |
|
The problem is, that could easily be abused. As soon as someone's hack falls off the newly added list, they could just update it and have it back up there again.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #4195 on: July 26, 2012, 09:00:05 AM » |
|
The problem is, that could easily be abused. As soon as someone's hack falls off the newly added list, they could just update it and have it back up there again.
there would need to have restritions like we do for anything like the user must put the changes in the text this would be neat for everyone to keep up with updates instead of uploading a V2 hack |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #4196 on: July 26, 2012, 09:25:52 AM » |
|
So, you're saying that the Vault Staff would need to check every hack's "update" to confirm they're legit updates and approve them?
Can't you people suggest things easier to achieve, or rather, just report bugs? I don't think the Vault needs this kind of optimization.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #4197 on: July 26, 2012, 10:42:11 AM » |
|
So, you're saying that the Vault Staff would need to check every hack's "update" to confirm they're legit updates and approve them?
Can't you people suggest things easier to achieve, or rather, just report bugs? I don't think the Vault needs this kind of optimization.
you could just let it and not check you know thrust ppl so you would just need to check if someone reported it has no new feature |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #4198 on: July 26, 2012, 02:00:49 PM » |
|
you could just let it and not check you know trust ppl so you would just need to check if someone reported it has no new feature
But it would still be more for the BV staff to deal with. I don't see what the trouble is to just upload V2 instead. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 26, 2012, 02:02:42 PM by Anonymous »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply #4199 on: July 26, 2012, 02:37:15 PM » |
|
I'd rather make a new Upload post then having a "bump" feature. As pointed out, it could be abused rather easily.
Still would be nice to have the idea I mentioned but *shrugs*
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
